How to Write an Award-Winning Workforce Development Nomination

Professional reviewing documents beside a laptop while preparing a workforce development award nomination

What makes a workforce development award nomination convincing? Not the size of a training budget or the number of activities delivered, but a clear account of the challenge, the approach and the impact on people. A strong nomination helps independent judges understand what changed and why it matters.

Choose the right award category

Read the criteria before drafting your entry. The Global Future Skills Awards categories distinguish between organisations, initiatives, teams and individuals. For example, the Workforce Development Award focuses on programmes that strengthen skills, progression and organisational capability; Future Skills Leader of the Year recognises the influence and achievements of an individual.

1. Establish the challenge

Explain what problem you were solving. Was there a shortage of technical skills, limited access to employment, a need to reskill experienced workers or a barrier to progression? Identify who was affected and explain why the challenge mattered.

2. Describe the intervention, not just its ambition

Outline what you designed or delivered: its objectives, audiences, duration, delivery partners and learning methods. Identify decisions that made your approach distinctive. If you are nominating an individual, explain exactly what that person led or contributed.

3. Give judges evidence of change

An effective entry links objectives to outcomes. Depending on the initiative, useful evidence might include:

01. Numbers of learners supported, with cohort and dates specified

02. Skills or qualifications achieved and how these were assessed

03. Employment, retention, promotion or career-progression outcomes

04. Changes in workforce capability, performance or confidence

05. Evidence that the initiative continued, expanded or influenced wider practice

Context matters. A completion rate without the number of participants or comparison period is difficult to interpret. Combine credible data with case studies or participant experiences where they add insight.

4. Explain inclusion and innovation

Innovation need not involve artificial intelligence. It could mean working more effectively with employers, recognising prior learning or designing a programme around people who have previously been excluded. Explain why the approach worked and what others could learn from it.

5. Be specific and honest

Avoid superlatives that are unsupported by facts. Distinguish plans from achievements, describe challenges you encountered and provide relevant supporting material, such as evaluation findings or partner statements.

A useful nomination structure

01. Challenge: the problem and the people affected

02. Approach: what you did and your specific role

03. Impact: measurable outcomes and credible examples

04. Learning: what improved and what remains to be done

05. Legacy: how the benefits will last or be shared

Considering an entry? Explore the award categories and start a nomination enquiry. The GFSA team can help you select the most appropriate category and understand the next steps.